Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dorothy Hartman v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 15-3818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY M. HARTMAN, a/k/a Dorothy M. Hartman
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a the Bank of New York, Trustee for the Certificate Holder of CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2005-86CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificats Series 2005-86-CB, c/o Bank of America, N.A., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH REALTORS, known as Prudential Real Estate and and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLET MALL et al
as 2:2011cv06378
Plaintiff:
CHARVEINA VANEL PARKER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLET MALL , PREMIUM OUTLET CENTERS , CHELSEA LIMERICK HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATHER v. PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH
as 2:2009cv04801
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY PRATHER
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roach et al v. Marrow et al
as 3:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Roach, Deneen Roach, Matthew Roach and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Marrow, John Adams, Jr., Cathy A. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
