Cases 11 - 20 of 361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BROWN v. YOUNGE
as 2:2023cv04499
Plaintiff:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES JUDGE JOHN MILTON YOUNGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Russell Scott Walker v. State of Delaware, et al
as 23-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL E. SCOTT WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, CITY OF MILFORD, MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
YOUNG v. WADSWORTH
as 2:2023cv02947
Plaintiff:
YOUNG TANISHA and TANISHA YOUNG
Defendant:
ANNABELLE WADSWORTH and WAWA INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Monighan et al v. Christopher et al
as 1:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Monighan, Brodie Monighan, Lydia Monighan and others
Defendant:
David E. Christopher, Gregory Millbrand, Chad Runkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. Clinton County et al
as 4:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Darla McCullough
Defendant:
Clinton County, Wellpath, LLC, Jeremy Shank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
