Cases 21 - 28 of 28
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LASRY v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Joseph F Lasry and JOSEPH F. LASRY
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Homeland Security, Transportation Security Adminstration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sie et al v. Munjone et al
as 5:2021cv05080
Plaintiff:
Kuanghua-Sophie Sie, Qing Zhao and WeiWu Zhao
Defendant:
James Munjone, JON D. STAPLES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sie et al v. Munjone et al
as 1:2021cv01927
Plaintiff:
Kuanghua-Sophie Sie, Qing Zhao and WeiWu Zhao
Defendant:
James Munjone, Jon D. Staples, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
