Cases 31 - 40 of 193
MARTINEZ v. EMERY
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE KATHERINE B. EMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. COURT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
COURT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAZAR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAZAR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCDERMOTT, DAVID BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CRUZ v. BRANTLEY
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE CRUZ
Defendant:
MALACHI BRANTLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. PHILADELPHIA FIGHT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
as 2:2023cv04626
Plaintiff:
MARIO CRUZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA FIGHT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEPTEMBER et al v. CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2023cv21415
Plaintiff:
MCDOWELL SEPTEMBER and ROBERT ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETH, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF GIACOMMO SACCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
