Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sampson v. Haines
as 4:2013cv00983
Plaintiff:
Earl Sampson
Defendant:
Dennis Haines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jimmy Murphy v. Mifflin County Regional Police, et al
as 13-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
MIFFLIN COUNTY REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, CPL. ROBERT L. HAINES, JR., LT. STEVE KNUDSON and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN BOOKING AND INTAKE OFFICERS, UNKNOWN DISTRICT ATTORNEY and UNKNOWN DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tyrone Hurt v. USA, et al
as 12-4284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (See: Bivens C. Six (6) Unknown Narcotics Agents-(1972) and SOCIAL JUSTICE OF AFRICAN AMERICAN IN THE CENTER OF THE WORLD, W.D.C. and across the Country (U.S.A.) (See: Haines v. Kerner, 1972)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tyrone Hurt v. Conference of Mayor
as 12-3724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT, (See: Haines v. Kerner, 1972)
Defendant - Appellee:
CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, *See: Bivens v. Six (6) Unknown Narcotics Agents - (1972)
Tyrone Hurt v. USA
as 12-3722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT, (See Haines v. Kerner, 1972)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
Tyrone Hurt v. USA
as 12-3725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT, (See: Haines v. Kerner, 1972)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
