Cases 41 - 50 of 271
KAPLO v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2021cv17975
Plaintiff:
MAREK KAPLO
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD, WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSYTON, III v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2021cv14674
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD, JASON CARTER and DOES 1-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2021cv03289
Plaintiff:
REGINALD CARTER
Defendant:
DONNA M. MURRAY, ANDREW W. LUND, DENISE CLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strange v. Carter
as 1:2021cv01168
Defendant:
James Carter
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv12614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SEGURA v. GREYSTONE PARK PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2021cv11662
Defendant:
TERESA MCQUIADE, CAROLE JOHNSON, GREYSTONE PARK PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN SEGURA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Carter v. Excel Maintenance and Construction VI, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Melvin Carter
Defendant:
Excel Maintenance and Construction VI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOSIC v. City of Philadelphia Department of Public Health Office of Food Protection
as 2:2021cv02202
Defendant:
TERRANCE CARTER, City of Philadelphia Department of Public Health Office of Food Protection and JOSEPH MELLON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E STOSIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS et al v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
SEMAJ CARTER and LEAH EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (4), JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
