Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Griffiths v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Anne Griffiths
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Corey D. O'Brien, James Wanzack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brace v. County of Luzerne et al
as 3:2011cv02101
Plaintiff:
William Brace
Defendant:
County of Luzerne, Luzerne County Employees' Retirement System, Luzerne County Retirement Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Benton Counselman, et al
as 11-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY A. HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
BENTON COUNSELMAN, JEFFERY HORVATH, STEVEN GETEK and others
Keefer v. Gembic et al
as 4:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Alfons Keefer
Defendant:
John Gembic , William Carpenter , Edward Griffiths and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOLDEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv00467
Plaintiff:
MARY BELINDA BOLDEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE BUREAU OF PRISONS IN PENNA., JEROME STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv06181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Hurst v. Benton Counselman et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Hurst
Defendant:
Benton Counselman, Jeffrey Horvath, Steven Getek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matson v. Scranton Police Department et al
as 3:2010cv00631
Plaintiff:
George Matson
Defendant:
Scranton Police Department, Brett Griffiths, Paul Stafursky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
