Cases 41 - 50 of 70
SULLIVAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02589
Plaintiff:
JAHBRE SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DENNIS CARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SULLIVAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02380
Plaintiff:
ZAIRE SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and ALEXA B. BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. WIDENER UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
WIDENER UNIVERSITY , CITY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID COUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCARDLE v. HUFNAGEL et al
as 1:2012cv00326
Defendant:
DANIEL F. CUSICK, JOHN DOE, ANNE M. MCARDLE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. MCARDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gessner v. Mazzitti and Sullivan et al
as 1:2012cv02185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gessner
Defendant:
Mazzitti and Sullivan and Debra Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv00886
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RYAN SULLIVAN, JASON SHENSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINSON v. AUGUSTIN et al
as 2:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY ATKINSON
Defendant:
YANCEY AUGUSTIN, MCFADDEN'S RESTAURANT AND SALOON, MCFADDEN'S RESTAURANT AND SALOON PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
STEWART v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
MONA LISA STEWART
Defendant:
J. BARRY JOHNSON, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PAUL HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
