Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Lawrence Persico, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-1376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOST REVEREND LAWRENCE T. PERSICO, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE, A CHARITABLE TRUST, ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE, ST. MARTIN CENTER INC., AN AFFILIATE NONPROFIT CORPORATION OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ERIE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-1374
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
PERSICO et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE T. PERSICO , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE , ST. MARTIN CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , THOMAS PEREZ , JACOB J. LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ZUBIK et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 2:2013cv01459
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. ZUBIK , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH and CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , THOMAS PEREZ , JACOB J. LEW and others
Movant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary Department of Health, et al
as 13-3536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 13-2814
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
MORRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2013cv02988
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MORRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2013cv00950
Plaintiff:
Deborah Morris
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Human Habilitation Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2013cv00906
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE NAMED SIERRA MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Zubik, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 13-1228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOST REVEREND DAVID A. ZUBIK, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of The Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
