Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Bolen v. Cumberland County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2013cv01003
Plaintiff:
Melody A. Bolen
Defendant:
Cumberland County Board of Commissioners , Cumberland County Prison Board , Earl F. Reitz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Justice v. City of Dover et al
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Justice
Defendant:
City of Dover, Carleton E. Carey, Sr. and James Hosfelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENNETT v. U.S. MARSHALLS et al
as 2:2012cv06199
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALLS, JOHN, STEVE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett v. U.S. Marshalls et al
as 1:2012cv01495
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
U.S. Marshalls, Phila Cops Officer Carey and Jonas and Unknown PA. State Police Car
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shahin et al v. City of Dover, Delaware et al
as 1:2012cv00604
Plaintiff:
Mazen Shahin and Nina Shahin
Defendant:
City of Dover, Delaware, Carleton E. Carey, Sr. and Cheryl A. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DUNCAN v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
RAHNEISHA DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , WILLIAM CAREY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
