Cases 51 - 60 of 78
BYARS v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. BYARS
Defendant:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA , SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION , ARLENE ACKERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WILSON v. BEIDELMAN
as 5:2011cv07472
Plaintiff:
LEROY L. WILSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL BEIDELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONOVER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv06946
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONOVER
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, LEROY D. NUNERY, WARREN G. HARDING MIDDLE SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS et al
as 2:2011cv06198
Plaintiff:
LEROY T. MOORE
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS , CHRISTOPHER KUBERIET and JOSEPH CELENTANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling v. Redevelopment Authority, et al
as 11-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY STERLING
Defendant - Appellee:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, CRANE ARTS LLC and others
HILL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv03300
Plaintiff:
LEROY HILL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTANEZ et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2011cv03060
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MONTANEZ , TULIA DRAGONA , SUMARA SHAKEEL and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, JENNIFER VELEZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Delaware v. Leroy Hefley
as 10-3578
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE
Defendant - Appellant:
LEROY HEFLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
