Cases 61 - 70 of 556
White v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
JohnJuan White
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer et al v. Havens et al
as 4:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Krista Meyer, K.J., K.A. and others
Defendant:
Officer Tyson Havens, 1-5 John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARR v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv03698
Plaintiff:
URSULA CARR
Defendant:
COUNTY CAMDEN, OFFICER SAMSON #1000, SERGEANT JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
Taron Hill
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, CAMDEN COUNTY, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
