Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Wyeth Pharm, et al
as 11-1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant - Appellee:
WYETH PHARM, (PFIZER), ACCENTURE, MEDFOCUS and others
Galanopoulos et al v. Schauer et al
as 1:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Patricia Galanopoulos and Nikos Galanopoulos
Defendant:
Russ Schauer , Christopher R. Ford , Chad R. Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOYER v. CITY OF OCEAN CITY et al
as 1:2010cv06610
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MOYER
Defendant:
CITY OF OCEAN CITY , JOHN VOGT , JOHN MAZZUCA and others
Counter_claimant:
CITY OF OCEAN CITY , JOHN MAZZUCA and JOHN VOGT
Counter_defendant:
JEFFREY MOYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HREZIK v. MOYER et al
as 5:2010cv04251
Plaintiff:
JOHN HREZIK
Defendant:
KEN A. MOYER, WILLIAM HEIM and CITY OF READING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOYER v. PELLICOTTI et al
as 5:2010cv02777
Plaintiff:
LEE BETH MOYER
Defendant:
MARK PELLICOTTI , ERIC WEAKNECHT , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
VURIMINDI v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS (PFIZER) et al
as 2:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant:
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS (PFIZER) , ACCENTURE , MEDFOCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv04747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Angelika Lamont v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-1845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELIKA LAMONT, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Eric J. Quick
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, NJ STATE POL, MARK MANZO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
