Cases 61 - 70 of 329
WARDLAW v. I.G.A. INTERNATIONAL MARKET et al
as 2:2021cv01547
Plaintiff:
EXAVIER WARDLAW
Defendant:
DWAYNE ROGERS, I.G.A. INTERNATIONAL MARKET, ALIED SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Academy Hill, Inc et al v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE, N.J. et al
as 2:2021cv01920
Defendant:
Michael Jingoli, CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE, Kenneth Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Academy Hill, Inc and Merrick Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CONVERSE v. CITY OF ORANGE et al
as 2:2021cv00872
Defendant:
DETECTIVE ROGERS, OFFICER SIMMONDS, CLIFFORD ROSS and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH NOEL, LOUCIANO DESSOURCES, HAILEY DESSOURCES and others
Plaintiff:
MARIE CONVERSE, AN, LD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vonville v. Luthcke et al
as 3:2020cv02446
Defendant:
Jessica Ladd, Tamhannock Township, Detective Craig Vanlouvender and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Joseph Vonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESSOURCES v. ORANGE et al
as 2:2020cv19886
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DETECTIVE ROGERS, DWAYNE WARREN and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS D DESSOURCES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
