Cases 71 - 80 of 1,082
Brown et al v. Adams County Children and Youth Services et al
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown and Elizabeth Sarah Brown
Defendant:
Adams County Children and Youth Services, Sarah Finkey, Pennsylvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: WILLIE A. BROWN
as 2:2023cv01749
Petitioner:
WILLIE A. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Middlesex Water Company v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al
as 3:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Middlesex Water Company
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Gladys Brown Dutrieuille, Steven M. DeFrank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REICH v. CHAN et al
as 5:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
BLAIR REICH
Defendant:
WENDY CHAN, KRISTEN JAQUIS, JUDGE SPAHN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSTICK v. SCAPERATTO et al
as 2:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
LAGALE BROWN ROSTICK
Defendant:
JAMES SCAPERATTO and JESSICA SCAPERATTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
