Cases 71 - 80 of 306
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMAS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01568
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. THOMAS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORRISTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT , EDWARD TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLISON v. DELAWARE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION et al
as 2:2017cv01567
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MILLISON
Defendant:
FRANK SHANNON and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00604
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham-Smith et al v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Delilah A. Graham-Smith and Rodney G. Smith
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre , Matthew Smith , Police Officers John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., X,Y,Z CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SATCHELL v. SHERIFF OF BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE SATCHELL
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF BUCKS COUNTY , NORRISTOWN BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT , KATHLEEN KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SUMMERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
WENDY SUMMERS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN P. DELANEY, WILLIAM LAWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
