Cases 71 - 80 of 75,394
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WALTON v. MCCARTHY et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WALTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCARTHY, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE NOS. 1-3 and POLICE SERGEANT JOHN DOE NO. 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LANS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv06172
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MICHAEL LANS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BARBARA C. STOLTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDAWAY v. WARBY PARKER-SUBURBAN SQUARE
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
WARBY PARKER-SUBURBAN SQUARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATEL, M.D. v. OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv06133
Plaintiff:
AARTI PATEL, M.D.
Defendant:
OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. and MAHESH TEKRIWAL, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
