Cases 81 - 90 of 204
Amro Elansari v. USA, et al
as 16-3417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMRO A. ELANSARI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DICKINSON SCHOOL OF LAW OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY and others
SCHWARTZ v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2016cv03770
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, TOMS RIVER MAYOR'S OFFICE, TOMS RIVER TOWN COUNSEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. TOWN OF DOVER et al
as 2:2016cv03440
Plaintiff:
BARRY M. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
TOWN OF DOVER , JAMES P. DODD , RICHARD ROSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell et al v. Balon et al
as 4:2016cv00779
Plaintiff:
Bruce M. Campbell and Kim L. Campbell
Defendant:
Charles Balon , Auchter , Szkodny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIORENTINO v. TOWN OF HAMMONTON et al
as 1:2016cv02019
Plaintiff:
MARK FIORENTINO
Defendant:
TOWN OF HAMMONTON , POLICE DEPARTMENT OF HAMMONTON , DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOTZ v. PIER et al
as 2:2016cv01210
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. KOTZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL PIER, ANTHONY LIGUORI, ANDREW MILONAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DUPELL v. FRANKLIN TOWNE CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 1:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
TODD A. DUPELL
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TOWNE CHARTER SCHOOL , FRANKLIN TOWNE SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES , JOSEPH M. VENDITTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Jones v. Town of Guilford, et al
as 16-1064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW N. JONES
Defendant:
TOWN OF GUILFORD, CT and CITY OF NEW HAVEN, CT
Matthew Jones v. Town of Bridgeville
as 16-1066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW N. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF BRIDGEVILLE, Delaware
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
