Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
WAITERS et al v. REPUBLIC BANK et al
as 1:2024cv05728
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA R. WAITERS, CYLE A. BURNETT and VICKIE BURNETT-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REPUBLIC BANK and CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. MOISE et al
as 2:2024cv04204
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
GERALD MOISE, SUSAN K. BOLLMAN, NORAH E. BRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
FRIEND et al v. IVEY et al
as 2:2023cv01241
Defendant:
REGINA D. JERNIGAN, APRIL LOGAN-RUSSELL, KAY IVEY and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN FRIEND, SANDRA FRIEND and Sandra McCann Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
EZEKWO v. LAUBER et al
as 1:2022cv04517
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
ALBERT G. LAUBER, SUSAN K. BOLLMAN, DRITA TONUZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
