Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fraternal Order of Police Pennsylvania et al v. TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PENNSYLVANIA LODGE, SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, CHRISTIAN WILBUR and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD, JAMES LEE, BAIRD M. STANDISH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CALHOUN et al v. TJM TREVOSE, LLC
as 2:2022cv03852
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CALHOUN and THOMAS CALHOUN
Defendant:
TJM TREVOSE, LLC doing business as RADISSON HOTEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CALHOUN v. FLAGGAN et al
as 2:2020cv04869
Defendant:
APPLE ONE and MICHELLE FLAGGAN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OPATHY CALHOUN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CALHOUN v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv02448
Plaintiff:
TIA RENEE CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, DANIEL WHITE, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
