Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv11308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VALENTIM v. HACKENSACK ROOFING CO, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07872
Plaintiff:
MARIA VALENTIM
Defendant:
HACKENSACK ROOFING CO, INC. and EDGAR HUERTAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-3134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. ALEX T. THOMAS
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-3133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC, CHRISTINA ROWE, PATRICIA BAUER and others
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-2921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
