Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HICKS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
TERMAINE JOSEPH HICKS and TERMAINE HICKS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARTIN VINSON, ROBERT ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SACKO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
SAHARO SACKO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CONFESOR NIEVES, MARTIN VINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WINGATE v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv01592
Plaintiff:
VINSON WINGATE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , LUIS SANCHEZ and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
