Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SANCHEZ-ORTIZ v. MENENDEZ et al
as 1:2023cv21172
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ-ORTIZ
Defendant:
OFFICER TRISTIAN J. MENENDEZ and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ortiz v. Tchorzewski et al
as 3:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
Dave Ortiz
Defendant:
Marek Tchorzewski and Anthony Malinowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JoAnn Fonzone v. Joe Oteri, et al
as 23-2261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANN FONZONE, AKA Judy McGrath
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE OTERI, OFFICER KELECHEWISCKY, OFFICER LESINETTE ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MAYWEATHER v. COUNTY OF ESSEX
as 2:2023cv00316
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, SGT. HERMAN PRIDE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER HALL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINN MAYWEATHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ortiz-Pagan v. Hartye et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz-Pagen and Carlos Ortiz-Pagan
Defendant:
Joseph F. Hartye, Judge William T. Tully and Mary Klatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
