Cases 1 - 10 of 825
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
HOFFMAN v. BAILEY
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
SARAH ANN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DR. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Allen
Defendant:
John E. Jones, III, Robert D. Mariani, Karoline Mehalchick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
MCDONALD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 3:2024cv04476
Plaintiff:
DESIREE MCDONALD
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CHARLES MOORE and ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
