Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pearson v. Marple Township et al
as 2:2023cv04444
Plaintiff:
Vonda Pearson
Defendant:
MARPLE TOWNSHIP, MARPLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief Brandon Graeff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WILSON v. ANASTAST et al
as 1:2020cv00653
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WILSON
Defendant:
RACHEL SMITH, JUDGE CIMINO, LORRAINE HOILLIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. HOILLIEN et al
as 1:2019cv21037
Defendant:
RACHEL SMITH, JESSICA ANASTASI, JUDGE CIMINO and others
Plaintiff:
BRAD WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Good, et al v. IRS, et al
as 15-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY P. GOOD and MARY A. GOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, HENRY SLAUGHTER, DEANN BENDER and others
Jeffrey Good, et al v. IRS, et al
as 14-3672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY P. GOOD and MARY A. GOOD, Husband and Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, HENRY SLAUGHTER, DEANN BENDER and others
GOOD et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2014cv00755
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. GOOD and MARY A. GOOD
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HENRY SLAUGHTER, DEANN BENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Kot v. Robert Killian, Jr., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES GEORGE KOT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT K. KILLIAN, JR., GLENN COE, VANESSA AVERY and others
COFFIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07794
Plaintiff:
EDWARD COFFIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DOMINICK COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOT v. KILLIAN et al
as 5:2010cv07305
Plaintiff:
JAMES GEORGE KOT
Defendant:
ROBERT K. KILLIAN, JR., GLENN COE, VANESSA AVERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
