Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ELLIS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M. ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH DEPT., THE OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
IGBAKIN v. COOLEY et al
as 2:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
SHAQWANNA IGBAKIN
Defendant:
FELICIA COOLEY, MONICA PRUETT, CAITLIN CACHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TRUESDALE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02204
Defendant:
OFFICER CAITLIN SMITH, OFFICER WILFREDO HERNANDEZ, CAITLIN DONAHUE and others
Plaintiff:
HYKEEM TRUESDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FOSTER v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 2:2015cv06289
Plaintiff:
RODMEN R. FOSTER
Defendant:
CAITLIN MCLAUGHLIN , MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and MICHAEL C. POTTEIGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINCE v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PRINCE
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY , DAVID HUMPRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOOD et al v. SHAPIRO & DENARDO, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv05296
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GOOD and MARY GOOD
Defendant:
SHAPIRO & DENARDO, LLC , CAITLIN M. DONNELLY , DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
