Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Valentine Shabazz v. Cade et al
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz
Defendant:
Cerron Cade, Jeff Flynn, Chris Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2023cv16641
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, NICK SABEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2023cv05286
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, NICK SABEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GURVEY et al v. M&T BANK, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. WEISSBROD GURVEY
Defendant:
M&T BANK, INC., ESSEX COUNTY OF NEW JERSEY, SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
