Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Newton v. Oden
as 3:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Sye Christopher Ras Newton
Defendant:
Georgette P. Oden doing business as G. Oden PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2022cv02399
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, MERICK B GARLAND, CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL A CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fleming et al v. SMITH
as 2:2021cv05446
Plaintiff:
Georgette Fleming and Tasheeba Fleming-Moore
Defendant:
CHAD SMITH and P/O CHAD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01698
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv15306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow et al v. Randy_Mastro, Esq., c/o Governor... et al
as 3:2014cv07828
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Randy_Mastro, Esq., c/o Governor..., Chris Christopher Christie, Esq., Charles A. Mckenna, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Richard Turzai v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 11-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD D. TURZAI
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, ROBYN L. BOTTESCH, Individually and as an officer for the City of Pittsburgh, JOSEPH REIFF, Individually and as an officer for the City of Pittsburgh and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
