Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv06623
Plaintiff:
RICKY E. KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOFFMAN v. DUDICK et al
as 5:2017cv04991
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN J. HOFFMAN
Defendant:
LEE DUDICK , JOHN DOE STATE TROOPER X, JOHN DOE SUPERVISOR STATE TROOPER Y and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaula Bhatt v. John Hoffman, et al
as 17-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Former NJ AG, AT&T INC, And Nationwide AT&T Subsidiaries, DENNIS M. GALVIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JAROSSY v. BARNEGAT TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2016cv01322
Plaintiff:
KELLY D. JAROSSY
Defendant:
BARNEGAT TOWNSHIP, KYLE A. CRANMER, ALEX J. HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURPURA v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv03534
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, STEVEN M. SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAGE v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2014cv02587
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN and BRIAN P. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE et al v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2014cv01313
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE, ANDRE LOVE, JASMINE LOVE and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HESSEIN, M.D. V. UNION COUNTY NEW JERSEY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2013cv04998
Plaintiff:
AMGAD A. HESSEIN, M.D.
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY NEW JERSEY PROSECUTORS OFFICE , UNION COUNTY, NEW JERSEY , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
