Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GOICOECHEA v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOICOECHEA
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and JOHN DOES 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
PEREZ et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK et al
as 2:2022cv04173
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO VICENTE PEREZ and CATHLEEN HANENBERG PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arunachalam v. Gordon et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Edward L. Tulin, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MUSLIH et al v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2020cv06694
Plaintiff:
ALIA MUSLIH, SOULAIHA MUSLIH and MUHAMMAD MUSLIH
Defendant:
THEODORE N STEPHENS II, ROBERT HARRIS, DARYL BROWN and others
Interested Party:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
