Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stubbs, III v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvette Kane, C. Darnell Jones, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY
as 2:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. DAVIS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY trading and doing business as JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER-GLEN HAZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
ROSADO v. WHITCRAFT et al
as 2:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES A. WHITCRAFT, JERMIAH F. KANE, PGM REAL ESTATES & ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
OLIVER v. KANE et al
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Andre Oliver
Defendant:
Police Officer Kane, John Doe Policer Officer #1, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
