Cases 1 - 10 of 17
CAPORALE et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 3:2021cv20484
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CAPORALE, TIM UNES, MAGGIE MULVANEY and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FINNEMEN v. DONIO et al
as 3:2021cv19485
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANN MARIE DONIO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NOEL L. HILLMAN, TERRENCE MERRIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAGGIE J. v. DONEGAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2020cv02782
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE J.
Defendant:
DONEGAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MAGGIE J. v. DONEGAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2020cv02782
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE J.
Defendant:
DONEGAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ANTHONY v. BERGERON et al
as 1:2020cv02050
Defendant:
DANIEL L/N/U, DRAND, JEAN L/N/U and others
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE HELEN ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNamara v. Susquehanna County et al
as 3:2017cv02182
Plaintiff:
Maggie McNamara
Defendant:
Susquehanna County , Elizabeth Arnold , Maryann Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Joseph Pilchesky v. Maggie Barone, et al
as 17-2916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH W. PILCHESKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE BARONE, Deputy U.S. Marshal, JOSEPH BROZOWSKI, Deputy U.S. Marshal and ROBERT LENAHAN, Deputy U.S. Marshal
ROBERTS v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2015cv02352
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE ROBERTS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOSEPH FUENTES, ADAM TIGHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
MAIER v. THE HONORABLE MAGGIE SNOW et al
as 5:2013cv06669
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAIER
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE MAGGIE SNOW, JOHN A. LEHMAN, LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
