Cases 1 - 10 of 30
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MEL STEIN REALTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartman v. Albert
as 1:2020cv02444
Defendant:
Scott E. Albert
Plaintiff:
Mel Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINKOVIC v. ENGLERT et al
as 1:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
MEL MARINKOVIC
Defendant:
JEANNE ENGLERT and ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINKOVIC v. BATTAGLIA et al
as 2:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
MEL MARINKOVIC
Defendant:
DAVID K. BATTAGLIA, ROBERT T. BOWER, RICHARD L. FINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mel Marinkovic v. David Battaglia, et al
as 17-3419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID K. BATTAGLIA, ROBERT T. BOWER, RICHARD L. FINK, In their Individual and Official Capacities and others
Mel Marin v. Secretary Commonwealth of Penn
as 16-3044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mel Marin v. Roberta Biros, et al
as 16-1998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERTA BIROS, MERCER COUNTY CONSERVATIVES, DAVID BIROS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
OFFICER MURPHY
Marin v. The Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Mel M. Marin
Defendant:
The Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Charles Rice, Charles Anthony Pascal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARIN v. FORD CITY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00791
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
FORD CITY PENNSYLVANIA and FORD CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARIN v. THE U.S. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2015cv00792
Defendant:
THE U.S. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION, ANDREW REID and THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
