Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Zhang v. Brian et al
as 1:2022cv01577
Plaintiff:
Yimao Zhang
Defendant:
Henry Brian, Megan Miller and Judge Rae M. Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MIMS v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE
as 2:2020cv01814
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIMS v. EDISON TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv13323
Defendant:
CHIEF THOMAS BRYAN, JOYCE SHIP-FREEMAN, Juwaan Thomas-Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. EDISON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv13323
Defendant:
CHIEF THOMAS BRYAN, JOYCE SHIP-FREEMAN, Juwaan Thomas-Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. EDISON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv13317
Defendant:
Joyce Ship-Freeman, Edison Township Police Dept., Matthew Helegesen and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCOSKER v. BOROUGH OF CHESILHURST et al
as 1:2019cv16120
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MCOSKER
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MIMS, BOROUGH OF CHESILHURST and JEFFREY GAUNTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING et al v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01398
Defendant:
ALLEN PORTER, JOSHUA LAMANCUSA, MICHAEL MROZEK and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WHITING and MICHELLE WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MIMS et al v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2012cv05166
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH MIMS and CLASS OF PRISONERS FROM 1/4/10 UNTIL PRESENT
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TERRANCE P. MOORE, ELISABETH MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HACKETT v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv02547
Plaintiff:
MIMS HACKETT, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANNE MILGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
