Cases 1 - 8 of 8
REEVE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03936
Plaintiff:
OMAR REEVE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER REYNOLDS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
LEWIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03062
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOES 1-10, LIEUTENANT JONAH CONWAY and others
Plaintiff:
OFFICER KELLI LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DELEE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02904
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER GESSNER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER KELLY, PHILADELPHIA POLICE CORPORAL SINCLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
DINELL DELEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Estep v. Mackey, et al
as 16-2143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ESTEP, in her own right and as personal representaitve for the Estate of Craig Baum, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
POLICE OFFICER MACKEY, BOROUGH OF CRESSON, TOWNSHIP OF CRESSON and others
Mary Estep v. Police Officer Mackey, et al
as 15-1943
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY ESTEP, in her own right and as guardian of Craig Baum, an incompetent person
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER MACKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF CRESSON, BOROUGH OF PORTAGE, OFFICER KELLY BOLVIN and others
Mary Estep v. Police Officer Mackey, et al
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY ESTEP, in her own right and as guardian of Craig Baum, an incompetent person
Defendant - Appellee:
POLICE OFFICER MACKEY, BOROUGH OF CRESSON, BOROUGH OF PORTAGE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER DONALD WYAR
ESTEP v. POLICE OFFICER MACKEY et al
as 3:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
MARY ESTEP
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MACKEY , BOROUGH OF CRESSON , CRESSON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
