Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robert Johnson v. Credit Acceptance Corp, et al
as 22-2561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Robert Johnson v. Credit Acceptance Corp, et al
as 22-2393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
JOHNSON v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. AVANOO, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05307
Defendant:
PROSPER C NWANKPA, DANIEL JACOBS and AVANOO, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO A. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADEFUMI v. PROSPER
as 2:2018cv05341
Plaintiff:
MR. OLANIYAN ADEFUMI
Defendant:
REBECCA PROSPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03601
Plaintiff:
KERIUM ALLEN GARRICK, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, REBECCA PROSPER and TIMOTHY C. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03519
Plaintiff:
KERIUM ALLEN GARRICK, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , REBECCA PROSPER and TIMOTHY C. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Gillette v. Diane Prosper, et al
as 16-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD EDWARD GILLETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN DIANE PROSPER, JULIUS WILSON, in his capacity as the Director of Prisons, TERRITORY OF VIRGIN ISLANDS and others
LIBERTY AND PROSPERITY 1776, INC. et al v. CORZINE et al
as 1:2008cv02642
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY AND PROSPERITY 1776, INC., SETH GROSSMAN, BETTY LOU BARNARD and others
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANNE MILGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
