Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kichman, Jr. v. Kramer-Scott et al
as 1:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
John W. Kichman, Jr.
Defendant:
Patty Kramer-Scott, Ethan David Kell, Travis Shenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PECK v. BOLOGNONE et al
as 2:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
SEAN PECK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MEGAN BOLOGNONE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KRISTA DAHL-CAMPBELL and CHIEF INSPECTOR MICHAEL COCHRANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baez v. Peck et al
as 1:2022cv01769
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Baez
Defendant:
ChristyLee L. Peck, United States (FTCA), Prime Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Peck et al
as 1:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
John Philip Wolfe
Defendant:
ChristyLee L. Peck, Caleb Bartlett, Nicole Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRANT v. PECK et al
as 2:2022cv03080
Plaintiff:
CARLTON ELLIOT GRANT
Defendant:
MR. JIM PECK, MR. CHRIS O'NEILL, MS. KIM BYE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HARR v. WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY et al
as 2:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE HARR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY, JOHN DOES 1-10, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. RALEIGH COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
CHARLES R. HUMPHREY, THEE HONORABLE ADAM DIMLICH, CITY OF BECKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv10146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
