Cases 1 - 10 of 14
E. Scarborough, III v. Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, et al
as 23-2414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DREVENAK v. CITY OF VENTOR CITY et al
as 1:2022cv04917
Plaintiff:
KAYLA DREVENAK
Defendant:
CITY OF VENTOR CITY, MICHAEL ARENA, PIERLUIGI MANCUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SCARBOROUGH v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv02436
Plaintiff:
E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murach v. Bayhealth Medical Center, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Murach
Defendant:
Bayhealth Medical Center, LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Connections Community Support Programs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCARBOROUGH v. NORRIS STREET LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv02794
Plaintiff:
FRANCES SCARBOROUGH
Defendant:
NORRIS STREET LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and KENNETH BARITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
