Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1332 Age Discrimination
GERMANO v. BECK et al
as 3:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
LAURA GERMANO
Defendant:
JENNIFER BECK, VIN GOPAL, CHRIS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Testa v. DOJ, et al
as 22-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMSON-REUTERS & SUBSIDIARIES, THOMSON-REUTERS HOLDINGS INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
TESTA v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2021cv18569
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
