Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AGNITA HOIST v. ATHENA BITCOIN ATM et al
as 3:2023cv21905
Plaintiff:
MYA MARY ANITA HOIST and MYA MARY AGNITA HOIST
Defendant:
ATHENA BITCOIN ATM, N.J. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. GOLSTEIN et al
as 3:2023cv00301
Defendant:
QUASEAN GOLSTEIN, JACQUELINE DUETTE, CITY OF TRENTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GOLDSTEIN et al v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
QUASEAN GOLDSTEIN and JACQUELINE DUETTE
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohamed Barry v. David Anderson, et al
as 22-3098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED BARRY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ANDERSON, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Director of the U.S. Marshals Service, KEVIN MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting United States Secretary of Homeland Security, DEPORTATION OFFICER RODY ZAMAR, Badge No. 4082 and others
HEALY v. SHIELDS et al
as 2:2012cv06636
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. HEALY
Defendant:
WILLIAM F. SHIELDS, HAVERFORD POLICE DEPT, HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE et al
as 2:2012cv04875
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE D.C. and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIV et al v. THORN et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
SOPHAL SIV , TONY KOAM , SOYITHA SIV and others
Defendant:
THORN , THOMAS REHIEL , POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN et al v. UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 3:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. MARTIN, PHILLIP C. MARTIN, JR. and DWAYNE L. MARTIN
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS, CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, U.S. MARSHALL SERVICE IN CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
