Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
MOSLEY v. CIPRIANI & WERNER, PC. et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
CIPRIANI & WERNER, PC. and SALVATORE VILARDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Mosley v. Starbucks Corp, et al
as 23-3095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORP, SALVATORE A. VILARDI and CIPRIANI WERNER
Defendant:
KEYLA PENA, Starbucks Manager, STARBUCKS CORP, Starbucks Manager, SALVATORE A. VILARDI, Starbucks Manager and others
MOSLEY v. STARBUCK CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv04000
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
STARBUCK CORP., SALVATORE VILARDI, CIPRIANI WERNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
COHEN v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE et al
as 2:2022cv04788
Plaintiff:
MINDY COHEN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, HINTZE, BENDUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1299
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
