Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BUTLER v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2018cv00646
Plaintiff:
ANDRE D. BUTLER
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and STACEY A. LAWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donna Pfender v. Secretary PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA PFENDER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities, RAYMOND SOBINA, Warden SCI Forest, in his individual and official capacities and RAYMOND LAWLER, Warden, SCI Huntingdon, in his individual and official capacities
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff:
JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWLER v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2010cv00196
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWLER
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, JOHN DOES NO. 1-3 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petry v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv02312
Plaintiff:
Keith Lynn Petry
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Raymond Lawler, Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pfender v. Beard et al
as 4:2009cv01838
Plaintiff:
Donna Pfender
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Raymond Sobina and Raymond Lawler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Grace et al
as 4:2009cv01143
Plaintiff:
Dorothy O. Taylor and Dorothy O. Taylor
Defendant:
James L. Grace, Raymond Lawler, Donna Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
