Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JORDAN v. LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
as 5:2023cv04486
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORDAN
Defendant:
LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JORDAN v. LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
as 2:2023cv04486
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORDAN
Defendant:
LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO, HILLS PET NUTRITION, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant:
MS. KIM, DEBRA NICHOLS, DAVE BALOGA and others
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv06623
Plaintiff:
RICKY E. KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Juan Bonilla Jr, et al v. City of York, et al
as 16-3066
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JUAN BONILLA JR
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERLIDIS BONILLA, individually & as Personal Representaive for the Estate of Juan Bonilla, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF YORK, YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER ROOSEN and others
The Estate of Juan Bonilla, Jr. et al v. The City of York, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2014cv02238
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Juan Bonilla, Jr. and Everlidis Bonilla
Defendant:
The City of York, Pennsylvania , York City Police Department , Christopher Roosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2010cv06439
Plaintiff:
CARNELL DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON , MICHELLE RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Wentz et al
as 1:2008cv01348
Plaintiff:
Adam Miller
Defendant:
William B. Wentz, Michael Jordan and Supervisor Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
