Cases 91 - 100 of 249
WILLIAMS v. TICE et al
as 2:2019cv01621
Respondent:
ERIC TICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHOPIRO
Petitioner:
MORRIS A. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAKENEY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01515
Defendant:
SGT. GOLD, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, T. SHAWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT BLAKENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. COMMON PLEAS COURT OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv01297
Plaintiff:
MORRIS A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nifas v. Serrano et al
as 1:2019cv01646
Defendant:
CO.IV. Morris, CO.1. Behney, Hearing Examiner Walters and others
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Nifas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00960
Defendant:
DR. RAMIREZ, ROBERT GILMORE, BRITTNY CHIAVETTI and others
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sinkler v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv01327
Plaintiff:
Freddie E. Sinkler
Defendant:
Block Officer Miller, Officer Danner, Security Robert Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLARD et al v. F.O.P. COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2019cv01187
Defendant:
MARTIN, BLANCHE CARNEY, F.O.P. COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL IDEEN and JAMES FOY BULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. MAZZOCCA et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARREN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
SUSAN CONINE, DOUG YUHOUSE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
