Cases 101 - 110 of 989
Kim Vo v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM VO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Department of Corrections, LONNIE OLIVER, Superintendent SCI Cmbridge Springs, CORRECTIONS OFFICER M. MCCURDY and others
John Bramble v. John Wetzel, et al
as 22-1188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BRAMBLE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the DOC
MAY et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
LANDON MAY and ROBERT WHARTON
Defendant:
Former Secretary JOHN E. WETZEL and Dept (of) Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mojica Carrion v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Leonardo J. Mojica Carrion
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Robins v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN ROBINS
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, Department of Corrections, SUPERINTENDENT SALAMON, SUPERVISOR TICE and others
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER DAMICO, UNIT MANAGER KRASNER, UNIT MANAGER OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and others
LLOYD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01853
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LLOYD
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GRIEVANCE COORDINATO MELINDA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WELTY v. DONKEWICZ et al
as 2:2021cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
GEORGE DONKEWICZ, SCI GREENE D.O.C., JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05445
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MITCHELL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONFORTI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONFORTI
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
