Cases 181 - 190 of 85,189
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Peralta v. District Attorney Lancaster County, et al
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PERALTA
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, BRADLEY BOOHER and others
TROY et al v. KUHN
as 1:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN TROY, JAVON HALL, ALDO NAVAS and others
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHNS, COMMISSIONER VICTORIA L. KUHN and JOHN AND JANE DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRYAN TRUSH, BARBARA A. MCDERMOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff:
MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv05773
Petitioner:
QUADIR WHITAKER
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Singleton v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SINGLETON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT WHALEN and LISA PETERS
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Hill, Jr. v. Warden SCI Brenner, et al
as 24-1829
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI BRENNER, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Alvin Washington v. Bregman, et al
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN and SGT. F. MCCLELLAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
