Cases 11 - 20 of 36
MUHAMMAD v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TREVOR WINGARD, MARK I. BERNSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 2:2015cv04899
Petitioner:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
MARK I. BERNSTEIN, R. SETH WILLIAMS, EVAN SILVERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUICK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03698
Petitioner:
G. HEATH QUICK
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Biddle v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wayne Biddle
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Emig Smith, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Forrest v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, CERT ATTACK GUARDS, STAFF AND GUARDS and others
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 3:2013cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 1:2012cv00318
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, CERT ATTACK GUARDS, STAFF AND GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLINTIC v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv06642
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCCLINTIC
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN WETZEL , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Forrest v. Nedab, et al
as 12-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Michael Forrest v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 12-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, CERT ATTACK GUARDS, GUARDS & STAFF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
