Cases 11 - 20 of 301
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Felix Cruz
as 23-2537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIX CRUZ
Cruz v. Walker et al
as 3:2023cv01387
Petitioner:
James R. Cruz
Respondent:
Superintendent Tina Walker and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHERE v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv04723
Petitioner:
JAIME FERNANDO GRACIA CHERE
Respondent:
WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abraham Cruz v. Federal Butner Mental Health Hospital
as 23-2388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION BUTNER NORTH CAROLINA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
MUNGIN v. CRUZ et al
as 1:2023cv04078
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MUNGIN
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN ANDY CRUZ and STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOODE v. ZALESKI et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ZALESKI, WILLIAM J. KNECHT, SHIVA RAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. TAYLOR
as 1:2023cv03305
Petitioner:
JOSE F. CRUZ
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FEGELY v. COLLINS et al
as 5:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHARLES FEGELY, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID C. COLLINS, SR, CAPTAIN LUIS CRUZ, LIEUTENANT ANTHONY PIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
