Cases 11 - 20 of 108
ALLEN v. CURETON et al
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
BRAD ALLEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY CURETON, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. Biggies et al
as 4:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Clarence Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Biggies, Corrections Nurse Brad, D.F. Oberlander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Ritchey et al
as 1:2022cv01517
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Payne
Defendant:
Brad Ritchey, CO2 Timpe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Glover et al
as 4:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
Todd Alan Brown
Defendant:
Warden Brad Glover, Deputy Warden Weikert, Nurse Susan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. County of Lycoming et al
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Jamal Bennett
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Brad Shoemaker, Matthew McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. TRATE
as 2:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
Ryan Davis #22692-040
Respondent:
BRAD TRATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. TRATE
as 1:2022cv00156
Petitioner:
RYAN DAVIS
Respondent:
BRAD TRATE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charles Talbert v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of PA Department of Corrections, SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY and others
Tyree Tyquan Moy v. Kevin DeParlos, et al
as 22-1723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE TYQUAN MOY
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN DEPARLOS, BRAD SHOEMAKER, RYAN BARNES and others
Bennett v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jamal Bennett
Defendant:
Brad Shoemaker and Mark Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
