Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 514
CARTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff: DARIUS CARTER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff: JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff: JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant: CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Carter v. Records
as 1:2024mc00195
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Mike Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Stubbs et al
as 1:2024mc00192
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Calli A. Stubbs and DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1620
Plaintiff: JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00177
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly and Collins Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YOUNG v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: BRYANT YOUNG
Defendant: SECRETARY DR. LAUREL HARRY, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, DEPUTY SECRETARY T. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?